ClimateVision.gov Logo
 

NEWS & EVENTS

 

Chemical Manufacturing - News & Events

American Chemistry Council Honors Energy Efficiency Award Winners

American Chemistry Council Logo

ARLINGTON, Va. (November 12, 2004) – As part of its ongoing efforts to improve the environment and the economy, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) today honored eight companies for energy efficiency improvements made in 2003. ACC announced a total of 19 awards to these companies for their company-wide or plant-specific progress.

Charles Van Vlack, Executive Vice President of ACC, announced the awards during a Climate VISION Workshop, conducted live via the Internet. Climate VISION is the Bush Administration's voluntary, public-private partnership to pursue cost-effective initiatives to reduce the projected growth in America's greenhouse gas emissions. The program is administered through the Department of Energy's policy and international program and the chemical industry, through ACC, is one of the participating industrial sectors.

Van Vlack said "It's particularly fitting to present the awards at this time of year, the beginning of the heating season. Natural gas prices are at all-time highs. Experts agree that the most effective short-term response to high prices is to conserve energy and use natural gas more efficiently. Today's winners offer proof positive that it pays to invest in efficiency and conservation measures."

Van Vlack also reminded the workshop attendees that the business of chemistry is energy intensive and relies on energy inputs not only to power its operations, but also as a raw material to manufacture many of its products. Energy costs can be as high as 85 percent of total production costs for some products. ACC members' efforts to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are critically important in the context of U.S. efforts to develop a comprehensive energy policy and to reduce national greenhouse gas emissions. "These awards publicly recognize that energy efficiency projects not only reduce greenhouse gases and other emissions but also add appreciably to each company's bottom line," Van Vlack observed. It's a win-win situation for the country, he said, because "the improvements protect the environment while helping American business compete globally." The total annual energy savings represented by the 19 awards amounts to 4.9 trillion BTUs, equal to the energy needs of about 26,000 households. That's the equivalent of annual energy usage for a town like Springfield, Ohio or Muncie, Indiana. Annual carbon dioxide reductions amount to 300,308 tons.

Van Vlack noted that natural gas, the lifeblood of the U.S. chemical industry, remains in short supply and prices are at historic highs. He said the price of gas futures had nearly doubled in the past month and were around twice what they were in Europe and China where competing companies were in position to undercut United States firms. "While Congress needs to act to increase domestic natural gas supply, these awards illustrate steps ACC members are taking to do their part in increasing natural gas conservation and efficiency."

The awards to the eight members are part of ACC's Energy Efficiency Continuous Improvement Program, an effort that encourages members to improve energy efficiency and minimize energy-related environmental impacts, thus strengthening international competitiveness. This year's winners were selected from five categories:

  • The "Environmental Impact" award is given for initiatives with substantial environmental benefits, including reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, in addition to energy efficiency improvements.

  • The "Energy Efficiency Program" award is given to companies with broad programs to achieve energy efficiency improvements, with components such as establishing energy teams, goal setting, communications, management support and recognition.

  • The "Non-Manufacturing Improvement" award is given for improvements resulting from energy efficient lighting, insulation, other building improvements and other non-manufacturing energy efficiency improvements.

  • The "Public Outreach" award is given for an effective program of involvement with the community regarding energy efficiency and related environmental impact activities.

  • The "Significant Improvement in Manufacturing" award is given to companies that improve energy efficiency in their manufacturing operations through technical innovations, creative projects or novel procedures or actions.

Awards can be given at any of four levels within the company: Corporate/Business Unit, Plant Site, Operating Unit or Project.

Companies receiving awards for 2003 are:

  • BASF Corporation
  • BP
  • Dow Corning Corporation
  • Eastman Chemical Company
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company
  • Merck & Co., Inc.
  • Celanese
  • Monsanto Company
  • Sasol North America, Inc.

This year, award-winning activities of five companies received the ACC's "Exceptional Merit" designation for each activity's particular excellence. The companies are BASF Corporation, Eastman Chemical Company, ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Merck & Co., Inc, and Sasol North America, Inc.

The award nominations were judged and the winners determined by a sub-group of the ACC Energy Team, joined by Dr. W.D. Turner, Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Energy Systems Laboratory at Texas A&M University.

A breakdown of the 19 award-winning activities follows. An asterisk (*) denotes an Exceptional Merit award designation.

Significant Improvement in Manufacturing - Plant Site

  • Dow Corning Corporation, Carrollton, Kentucky Plant for Reducing Natural Gas Usage in Combustion Equipment through Six Sigma Application
  • Eastman Chemical Company, Tennessee Operations, Utilities Division, Kingsport, for Utilize Turbogenerators Nos. 13 & 15 to Help Control Plant 600 PSI Steam Distribution System Pressure*
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Elkton, Virginia Site for Stonewall Plant Energy Efficiency Projects*
  • Sasol North America, Inc., Lake Charles, Louisiana Chemical Complex for Automated Steam Balance
  • Sasol North America, Inc., Lake Charles, Louisiana Chemical Complex for Waste Heat Recovery Boiler Improvements

Significant Improvement in Manufacturing – Operating Unit

  • BP, Green Lake, Texas Plant for Incinerator Energy Improvements
  • Eastman Chemical Company, Acid Concentration Department/Advanced Controls Technology Group, Kingsport, Tennessee for Acid Con HOAc Stripper Column Control
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana – Operating Unit for Optimization of Kettle Heat Exchangers
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana – Operating Unit for Compressor Kickback Controls at EPLA-W
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Baytown, Texas Chemical Plant for Implementation of XyMax Technology at Aromatics Paraxylene Feed

Significant Improvement in Manufacturing – Project

  • Eastman Chemical Company, Acid Concentration Department, Kingsport, Tennessee for De-Ionized Water Heat Integration with #28 Azeo Column Condenser*
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Baytown, Texas Olefins Plant for BOP 2003 Energy Efficiency Project*
  • Sasol North America, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland Plant for Paraffin Tower Heat Recovery Condenser

Energy Efficiency Program – Corporate/Business Unit

  • Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Energy Reduction Initiative Team, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey for Merck Global Energy Management Program*

Energy Efficiency Program – Plant Site

  • BASF Corporation, Freeport, Texas Site for Site Energy Audits*
  • ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Beaumont, Texas Chemical Plant for Site Energy Reduction Through Better Design, Operation and Maintenance*

Public Outreach – Plant Site

  • Sasol North America, Inc., Lake Charles, Louisiana Chemical Complex for Vent Containment*

Environmental Impact – Plant Site

  • Monsanto Company, Flowables, Muscatine, Iowa Plant for Rinsate Project

Non-Manufacturing Improvement – Plant Site

  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey Site for Heat Recovery Project

Download Acrobat Reader
2005 Responsible Care® Energy Efficiency Award Winners (PDF 58 KB)
Tabulation of Energy Savings and CO2 Emission Reductions (PDF 52 KB)


Page Last Modified:   August 7, 2008