Climate Challenge Logo

Climate Challenge Options Workbook

DOE's Energy Partnerships for a Strong Economy

Rule

Climate Challenge Options Workbook

A Collaborative Effort of the
United States Department of Energy
and the
Electric Utility Industry

October 1994

PREFACE

The Climate Challenge Options Workbook is a work in progress. It is intended to be a living document that can provide guidance to electric utilities that desire to undertake voluntary and cost-effective actions to reduce, avoid, or sequester greenhouse gases. It has been developed by the Climate Challenge Options Task Group, one of the working groups of the Climate Challenge program, a collaboration between the electric utility industry and the Department of Energy. The options presented in the Workbook should not be considered all-inclusive. As they are identified, additional options may be included in future versions of the Workbook.

The workbook identifies a number of opportunities for greenhouse gas reduction, avoidance, or sequestration, many of which do not require regulatory or legislative changes. It also includes descriptions of many of the barriers which may deter progress, along with suggestions for overcoming those barriers. It is unlikely that all potential solutions will be implemented or that all barriers will be overcome. However, the scope of opportunities is sufficiently broad and robust that, even in this context, aggressive implementation of the opportunities available should achieve the major greenhouse gas emission reduction, avoidance, and sequestration desired under the Climate Challenge program.

Applicability

Each option should not be considered appropriate for every utility. Utilities vary widely in size, geographic location, business and regulatory environment, customer base, fuel mix, and type of generation. In fact, some utilities may not generate electricity at all, but rather purchase their electricity for distribution.

Because of each utility's unique situation, the range of options available to the utility may be less than the total range presented in the Workbook. For example, a distribution-only utility may not be able to take advantage of the supply-side options. Other options may not be practical for many utilities due to economic or regulatory reasons.

A utility's existing fuel mix will determine whether some options will increase or decrease greenhouse gas emissions. For example, options using energy storage devices could increase greenhouse gas emissions if the emissions from generation used to charge the storage devices are greater than the emissions from the generation being replaced.

The menu of options provided in this Workbook may result in both favorable and unfavorable inadvertent environmental impacts. Because these potential impacts are generally site-specific in nature, they are not addressed in this Workbook. For example, residential weatherization measures may result in a degradation of indoor air quality, radon accumulation, etc.

Structure

Each option listing contains:

    The option's Name;
    A narrative Description of the option;
    Barriers to implementation;
    Possible Solutions to overcoming the barriers;
    Potential Partnerships which could be developed to implement the option; and
    A list of Case Studies which illustrate use of the option.

Options are organized according to area of application:

    End Use;
    Renewable Energy Generation Technologies;
    Other Generation Technologies;
    Transmission;
    Distribution;
    Transportation; and
    Other.

An appendix containing bibliographic material from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is located at the end of the Workbook. Materials are organized and listed in the same order as the options.

Barriers and Solutions

Barriers associated with implementation of some of the options may be significant. These barriers may include technological feasibility, cost, legal and regulatory issues, public concerns, and other factors. Reduction or removal of these barriers and providing appropriate incentives will have a strong influence on the desirability and effectiveness of these programs.

For some of the options, solutions to overcoming barriers have been proposed by the electric utility industry which involve legislative, policy, or regulatory action. These industry-proposed solutions require implementation by a third party (e.g., regulatory or legislative bodies) and are listed separately. Segments of the electric utility industry implementing these actions may work towards implementation of these solutions. DOE will support these efforts as appropriate.

Joint Implementation

The Administration has recognized the significant potential for cost-effective emission reductions in areas outside of the U.S. The Framework Convention on Climate Change allows countries to explore emission reduction projects together under a program of "Joint Implementation" (JI). Essentially all of the options contained in this workbook are suitable for joint implementation. The barriers and solutions which have been identified, in many instances, however, would not be applicable. JI activities would present their own unique problems.

Symposium

On July 12, 1994 a draft version of the Climate Challenge Options Workbook was the subject of a symposium by a panel of experts from outside the Climate Challenge organizations. The panel focused on three areas: (1) evaluation of the options in the Workbook; (2) suggestions for additional options; and (3) identification of incentives and barriers to implementation of the options. This edition of the Workbook reflects the input and recommendations of the panelists through: (1) the addition of options; (2) expanding other options; and (3) including a annotated bibliography of material about the individual options. The Symposium panelists were:

    Roger Dower, Climate, Energy and Pollution Program, World Resources Institute;

    Cecilia (Sid) Embree, Independent Consultant, formerly of the United Nations Development Programme;

    Clark Gellings, Electric Power Research Institute;

    Alice LaBlanc, Environmental Defense Fund;

    Frank Murray, New York State Energy Office;

    Don Ritter, National Environmental Policy Institute; and

    Scott Sklar, Solar Energy Industry Association.

Comments

The Climate Challenge Options Workbook is a work in progress and, as such, the Climate Challenge Options Task Group is interested in receiving comments that can be incorporated into future editions of the Workbook. Please address comments to either:

John Novak                      Kurt Klunder
Director, Environmental         Office of Utility Technologies
Activities                      Rm. 6B-128
Edison Electric Institute       U.S. Department of Energy
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.       1000 Independence Avenue, S.W
Washington, D.C. 20004          Washington, D.C. 20585


OPTIONS WORKBOOK

TABLE OF CONTENTS


END USE

RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

OTHER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

TRANSMISSION

DISTRIBUTION

TRANSPORTATION

OTHER

APPENDIX - BIBLIOGRAPHIC MATERIALS

ABBREVIATIONS

AGA		-	American Gas Association
APPA		-	American Public Power Association
ARI		-	American Refrigeration Institute
ASHRAE		-	American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, 
			and Air-Conditioning Engineers
BACT		-	Best Available Control Technology
CAA		-	Clean Air Act
CCAP		-	Climate Change Action Plan
CFC		-	Chlorofluorocarbons
CNG		-	Compressed natural gas
CWA		-	Clean Water Act
DSM		-	Demand side management
DOE		-	U.S. Department of Energy
DOI		-	U.S. Department of the Interior
EEI		-	Edison Electric Institute
EPA		-	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPRI		-	Electric Power Research Institute
EWG		-	Exempt Wholesale Generator
FERC		-	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GHG		-	Greenhouse gas
GHP		-	Geothermal heat pump
GRI		-	Gas Research Institute
HVAC		-	Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
IGCC		-	Integrated gasification combined cycle
IGT		-	Institute of Gas Technology
IRP		-	Integrated resource plan
IRS		-	Internal Revenue Service
LAER		-	Lowest Achievable Emission Rate
LPG		-	Liquefied petroleum gas
LPPC		-	Large Public Power Council
MSW		-	Municipal solid waste
NARUC		-	National Association of Regulatory Utility
			Commissioners
NASEO		-	National Association of State Energy Offices
NEI		-	Nuclear Energy Institute
NERC		-	North American Electric Reliability Council
NPDES		-	National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NRC		-	Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NRECA		-	National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
NREL		-	National Renewable Energy Laboratory
NSPS		-	New Source Performance Standards
PSD		-	Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PURPA		-	Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
RDF		-	Refuse derived fuel
RET		-	Renewable energy technology
USDA		-	U.S. Department of Agriculture

END USE

Of the three segments within the electric energy system --- generation, delivery, and end use --- end use offers the greatest potential for large increases in efficiency that can translate into avoided greenhouse gas emissions or net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Improved end use technologies and practices can be substituted for less efficient ones, thereby reducing electricity demand, electric generation, and greenhouse gas emissions. Substituting energy-efficient electrotechnologies for fossil fuel-intensive alternatives may also reduce overall energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, depending on a utility's generation mix and the relative efficiencies of the fossil fuel technology and the substitute electrotechnology. In addition, use of a modern electrotechnology often results in superior quality products and/or services.

Utilities can influence electric end use through demand-side management (DSM) programs and by encouraging and supporting energy-efficient electrotechnologies. While these activities often overlap substantially, for the purposes of the options to be discussed, DSM will refer to technologies and practices that are intended to reduce the total demand for electricity and/or produce changes in a utility's load shape that result in a net reduction or avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions and savings for the customer. Electrotechnologies will refer to electric technologies that can substitute for other, more energy-intensive technologies, resulting in a net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT

Demand-side management (DSM) encompasses those utility activities that influence customer use of electricity to produce both desired changes in a utility's load shape and reduced costs for the customer.

Electric utility companies may provide incentives (e.g., rebates) and/or direct installation of measures to encourage actions that will improve efficiency and have potential to contribute to energy use reduction and load shifting. Utilities may also provide information and education, including technical and design assistance. The reduced energy needs associated with DSM activities will result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Option Category:

End Use -- DSM

Name of Option:

Residential Programs

Description:

Residential DSM activities encompass a broad range of utility/customer interactions including almost any type of program involving residential customers. Some activities involve direct conservation of energy, while others employ "load shaping" or "load shifting" methods to reduce peak demand requirements.

Residential DSM programs are primarily directed at three areas:

Examples of some current utility programs directed at improving the energy efficiency of customer appliances and at reducing greenhouse gas emissions include:

  • installing air source and geothermal (ground source) heat pumps (GHPs);

  • replacing old inefficient air conditioners with high-efficiency units;

  • installing heat pump water heaters;

  • replacing incandescent lighting with compact fluorescent lighting where appropriate;

  • replacing old refrigerators and freezers with new, high-efficiency units; and

    performance testing of appliances and equipment.

Examples of programs directed at improving the energy efficiency of new and existing construction include:

  • for existing construction, weatherization measures (insulation, air sealing, window treatments, etc.); and

  • for new construction, promoting whole house energy performance improvements (increased insulation, better windows, superior air sealing, improved heating and air conditioning distribution systems, mechanical ventilation, passive solar design and construction, and other appropriate renewable applications).

Examples of programs aimed at managing residential load are:

  • home automation systems;

  • direct utility control of customer air conditioners and water heaters; and

  • rate structures that encourage off-peak electricity consumption. Such "load shifting" will result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions when the off-peak electricity is generated with a lower carbon fuel than the on-peak electricity.

Go to Residential Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Barriers:

  • Tax treatment: Some IRS auditors have disallowed the current deductibility of DSM expenditures and have required capitalization of these expenditures. This action can jeopardize the financial viability of DSM programs.

  • Lack of uniformity of energy codes.

  • Lack of uniformity in retail energy efficiency standards.

  • Lack of real-time pricing for residential customers.

  • Lack of capital for customer purchase of new, high-efficiency equipment.

  • Lack of adequate information on costs and benefits.

  • Air source heat pumps have not gained popularity in Northern climates due to concerns regarding inefficiency at low temperatures (efficiency drops off below 32 degrees Fahrenheit).

  • The primary barrier for GHPs is high first cost (installation and equipment) compared to other heating systems. Installing heat exchange piping in the ground via wells, trenches, or pits accounts for the majority of the additional cost. The other major barrier is the lack of a competitive infrastructure in most markets where utility involvement has not been extensive. For existing homes, a potential barrier is the disruption of the yard that may result from some installation methods.

  • The use of air-to-water heat pumps for water heating has been very limited to date, due primarily to the higher first costs, installation costs, and the relatively long payback period. In addition, there are many instances where the heat pump water heater is not the appropriate application. The consumer has developed a bias against this technology because of the inappropriate applications.

  • The largest barrier to passive solar design in northern states is the perception that homes do not receive enough sun to make passive solar a viable option. This is a misconception of the value of passive solar.

  • Few experienced/trained/equipped installers for earth-coupled systems.

Go to Residential Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Solutions:

  • Participate in Edison Electric Institute's (EEI's) "E-Seal" program.

  • Participate, as appropriate, in CCAP Action #6 to form "Golden Carrot" market-pull partnerships for advanced residential technologies.

  • Participate, as appropriate, in CCAP Action #7 to develop enhanced Residential Appliance Standards.

  • Participate, as appropriate, in CCAP Action #8 to promote Energy-Efficient Mortgages.

  • Participate, as appropriate, in CCAP Action #9 to expand the Cool Communities program in cities.

  • Participate, as appropriate, in CCAP Action #11 to create Housing Technology Centers.

  • Raise and standardize the minimum efficiency standards in state energy codes.

  • Use real-time pricing and automated DSM.

  • Establish the air source heat pump's performance in cold climates and evaluate customers' acceptance of the product.

  • Establish geothermal heat pump marketing programs (some utilities currently have these see Case Studies below). For example, the typical utility rebate for the purchase of geothermal heat pumps is $250/ton. These marketing programs have markedly reduced geothermal heat pump installation costs in the utility's service region by spurring growth and therefore competition among installers. Typical homeowner payback under these programs is about 3-5 years.

  • Increase customer awareness of options for passive solar design, all new construction could benefit from building siting. One simple passive solar option is the addition of a sun porch or sun room to a customer's home. In many cases, the benefits of siting are greater on the cooling side than on the heating side; judicious use of glass can significantly reduce cooling loads, in many cases making air conditioning unnecessary in certain climate areas.

  • Incentives from utilities, including financing, can help reduce the cost of energy-efficient equipment and encourage participation in load management and conservation programs.

  • Participate in the National Earth Comfort Program, an industry/government partnership to increase the geothermal heat pump market from 40,000 units/year to 400,000 units/year.

  • Increase the direct installation of cost-effective conservation measures by utilities to target applications where customers lack sufficient motivation and/or resources.

Industry-proposed solutions requiring legislative, policy, or regulatory action.

  • Tax treatment: Clarification that DSM expenditures are deductible in the year incurred. This can be accomplished either administratively through IRS notification or rulemaking.

Go to Residential Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Partnerships:

  • Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, National Association of Home Builders, EPRI, Ground Source Heat Pump Association, well drillers, American Refrigeration Institute (ARI), and Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association (GAMA).

  • State builders associations, realtor organizations, and lending institutions.

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Passive Solar Industries Council, Los Alamos National Laboratory, DOE Office of Building Technology, DOE Contact - Diane Pirkey, Manager of DSM Programs, (202) 586-9839.

  • E-Seal has been created as a national initiative to promote energy efficiency and environmental awareness in both new construction and retrofit home programs.

  • The National Earth Comfort Program is accelerating the market penetration of GHPs. The program strategy includes initiatives aimed at reducing first costs, building technology confidence and awareness, and bolstering infrastructure for installation. One of the objectives of this program is to establish model utility marketing programs. After pilot runs of such marketing programs, the model programs are intended to serve as a validated pattern for encouraging wide-scale utility adoption. A point of contact is Mike McGrath, EEI, (202) 508-5552.

  • Utilities and local lending institutions.

  • American Solar Energy Society (ASES).

  • Northeast Solar Energy Association (NESEA).

Case Studies:

Electric utilities across the nation are involved in hundreds of programs. The following are examples.

  • "Passive Solar Design Strategies: Guidelines for Home Builders", Passive Solar Industries Council, Solar Energy Research Institute, Charles Eley Associates.

  • Minnesota Power's "Triple E" residential new construction program creates a partnership in small town/small urban area construction environments providing incentives to builders and consumers if new construction meets prescriptive and performance standards.

  • Golden Carrot -- national effort for new refrigeration development.

  • "Energy Crafted Home" (ECH), sponsored jointly by New England Electric System (NEES) and Northeast Utilities (NU). ECH encourages high-efficiency in residential construction through a performance-based energy standard, training, quality assurance, technical assistance, rebates paid to builders, and marketing assistance to builders. NEES and NU have had good experiences working with builders (including having their input during program design) and find that builders are an excellent trade ally. The program has led to the installation of many GHPs in NU's case.

  • "Energy Advantage Home" is a systems approach to an energy-efficient home. The program looks at a home as a set of interactions and seeks to maximize energy efficiency at the system level, as opposed to a prescriptive type program where energy efficiency measures are looked at individually. This is a result of a partnership between Northern States Power and Minnegasco with the Builders Association of Minnesota. Results from this home should come in late 1994/early 1995. The program was based on the "Energy Crafted Home" program described above.

  • Northern States Power (NSP), working in partnership with the Science Museum of Minnesota, has established a permanent urban energy and environmental awareness exhibit entitled "Green Streets". The project is unique because the museum has used its participation in NSP's energy efficiency programs and renewables research as a part of this exhibit. The museum undertook an aggressive and comprehensive lighting retrofit using NSP rebates and then made this retrofit a part of the Green Street exhibit. In addition, NSP has installed a 12 kw photovoltaic system at the museum. One of the primary objectives of this project is to use the museum as a model to demonstrate energy efficiency and alternative energy technology. The exhibit is primarily funded by NSP.

  • Potomac Electric Power Company has several active residential DSM programs. They include:

      (1) The "Save and Save Again", program which provides residential customers with discount coupons for cost-effective, high-efficiency lighting and water heating products that are available from local retailers.

      (2) The "Apartments Plus" program, which provides for installation of cost-effective energy-efficient lighting and water heating measures for low-income residents of multi-family properties free of charge.

      (3) The "Powerwatcher Loan" program, which conditionally approves qualifying loan applications from its residential customers for the purchase of energy-efficient central heat pump and air conditioning systems. The utility guarantees the loan repayment so that the participating lending institution can expedite loan processing for prompt payment of the HVAC contractor.

      (4) The "Kilowatchers" program, which provides residential customers with bill credits for allowing the utility to cycle heat pumps, air conditioners, and water heaters at peak times using radio control switches on a limited number of days each year.

  • Eastern Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC) has had a GHP marketing program since 1986, in which rebates of $250/ton have been offered. EKPC currently attributes at least 10 MW of peak demand savings (approx. 3000 units installed) to this program, and projects that by the year 2000 the figure will be close to 30 MW (approx. 8500 units). Customer savings with GHPs are estimated to be $350/yr. For information contact Conn Abnee,(606) 744-4812.

  • Public Service of Indiana (PSI) participated with the developer of a 126-home subdivision to install GHP ground loops ahead of construction. This program reduced installed costs to the developer by as much as $2,400 per home, with an average loop cost of $1,800. Customer savings are estimated at $400 annually. PSI has since entered into agreements to install ground loops in 40 more subdivisions totalling 1,400 homes. In the two-year period from 1986 to 1988, installations in PSI's service area rose from 2.6 percent to 8 percent of all new homes. For information contact Jerry Brandom, PSI, (317) 838-2128.

  • Fort Collins Light and Power Department, Fort Collins, Colorado, offers a home energy rating system to residential customers. The rating allows people shopping for a house to check the home's energy rating in much the same way that you check a car's gas mileage before deciding which model to buy. The program, called "Energy Score", gives customers a rating for their house on a scale from 0-100, depending on the level of energy efficiency. For homeowners who receive a low score and want to improve the efficiency level of their homes, the city utility offers zero-interest loans for retrofits. New home buyers now consider the "Energy Score" of a home when searching for new homes.

  • General Public Utilities subsidiaries Metropolitan Edison and Pennsylvania Electric have initiated the "Good Cents Comfort Home" program for high-efficiency, newly constructed, electrically heated homes and apartments. In addition to performance standards, training for building industry participants, and technical assistance, the Good Cents Program offers guaranteed performance and electric bills for warranted homes.

  • Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L) has initiated programs to advance DSM and energy efficiency in its territory and throughout New Jersey, including: an appliance turn-in program; a GHP initiative; participation in EEI's Triple E home project; participation in the Golden Carrot Super Efficient Refrigerator project; participation in the Geothermal Consortium; promotion and sale of compact fluorescent lighting; providing programs for the application of weatherization; participation in electric lawn mower promotional efforts; and instituting favorable cost recovery and rate treatment for energy conservation measures.

  • Metropolitan Edison is initiating a new "Test Drive" program which allows customers to try out cordless electric lawn mowers and electric grills for up to two weeks free. The program will be a one-time customer offering available at participating rental stores. It is designed to help customers determine if new, all-electric appliances meet their needs.

  • Northeast Utilities' Solar Home Plan Book, now in its third edition, offers nine affordable passive solar home plans, all traditional New England designs. To date, over 50,000 copies have been distributed, with hundreds of homes actually built from the plans.

Go to Residential Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Option Category:

End Use -- DSM

Name of Option:

Commercial Programs

Description:

Commercial DSM activities encompass a broad range of utility/customer interactions including almost any type of utility program involving commercial customers.

Commercial DSM technology options have demonstrated the potential to enable customers to exercise some level of control over their monthly energy bills while simultaneously helping their local utility achieve its load shape modification goals. Six general categories of technology options for commercial customers are:

Barriers:

Go to Commercial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Solutions:

  • Shorten owner payback period or lower owner's up-front cost.

  • Provide product information.

  • Provide design assistance.

  • Provide seminars/training.

  • Provide "market-pull" efforts to encourage manufacturers.

  • Pursue rate incentives in order to earn a return for conducting DSM programs effectively. (See EPAct [[section]] 111)

  • Participate in CCAP Action #1, the DOE Rebuild America and the EPA Energy Star Buildings programs.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #2 to expand EPA's Green Lights program.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #3 to design and implement energy management programs for state and local public buildings.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #4 to expand cost-shared demonstrations of emerging energy efficiency technologies for commercial buildings.

  • Participate in EEI's National Accounts Network to provide project management and construction management assistance to commercial and governmental customers.

  • Provide financing to commercial and governmental customers to help address the issue of first cost.

  • Provide case studies of successful conservation projects completed by customers for distribution to interested customers.

  • Participate in the National Earth Comfort Program.

Industry-proposed solutions requiring legislative, policy, or regulatory action.

  • Tax treatment: Clarification that DSM expenditures are deductible in the year incurred. This can be accomplished either administratively through IRS notification or rulemaking.

Go to Commercial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Partnerships:

  • DOE, EPRI, EEI, National Laboratories, and DSM advocates plus experts from various energy organizations, e.g., American Institute of Physics (AIP), ARI, the Electrification Council, EEI's National Accounts Network customers, chiller manufacturers and representatives, mechanical contractors, and regulatory commissions, DOE Contact - Diane Pirkey, Manager of DSM Programs, (202) 586-9839.

Case Studies:

  • In Gradyville, Pennsylvania, HEATAC Systems installed a 1,100-ton commercial GHP system for a retirement center. This project, completed in 1990, is the nation's first metered space-conditioning service using GHPs. HEATAC financed, installed, operates, and maintains the GHP system over a 20-year contract. HEATAC charges the customer for space-conditioning and water heating on a Btu basis.

  • At the Ft. Polk, Louisiana, Army base, an agreement for the largest GHP shared energy savings project was signed in January, 1994, with an estimated value of over $20 million. The Ft. Polk project will involve replacement of HVAC units on over 4,000 residences (8,000 tons). The contractor, Co-Energy Group, estimates that over 70 percent of the energy savings will come from GHPs. Lighting, building envelope improvements, and showerheads will contribute the balance of the savings.

  • Potomac Electric Power Company has two pilot programs:

      (1) A program with the District of Columbia Government that provides project management and construction management assistance for the design, procurement, installation, and testing of cost-effective conservation measures which are financed by the utility and will be repaid by the customer on their monthly utility bills.

      (2) A program to finance cost-effective conservation measures for repayment on monthly utility bills so that the average annual utility bill will show a net reduction.

  • "Energy Assets" is a program that provides design assistance for new commercial construction projects. Northern States Power (NSP) offers additional funding for energy-related design analysis to engineers and architects. The program also offers financial incentives to offset the costs of higher efficiency design options and verification service to help insure new buildings operate as intended.

  • NSP offers a "Local Government Energy Conservation Program" which targets city and county government-owned and -leased buildings. This program facilitates energy conservation activities within government facilities by providing attractive financing and funding for engineering and auditing resources and paying a "bounty" on kilowatt-hour savings. NSP will make up to $5 million per year for five years available in interest-free loans. Each city or county agency is limited to $1 million in new loans per year.

  • Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) has facilitated the implementation of favorable cost recovery and rate treatment for a number of commercial programs which promote conservation and DSM. These programs include: rebates for high-efficiency equipment including lighting, motors, and HVAC; design grant assistance for new construction studies and analysis of equipment; the Power Partners Program, which provides financing and direct installation of high-efficiency equipment; assistance to schools, military installations and public buildings for the installation of thermal storage; implementation of educational programs concerning CFCs and chiller retrofits; participation in EPA's Green Lights program, including the relamping of JCP&L corporate headquarters; and the development of possible promotional programs for commercial geothermal heat pumps.

  • Alabama Power and a national retailer electric redesign project.

  • Georgia Power and a national restaurant direct comparison of gas and electric restaurants.

  • Mississippi Power and a national retailer heat pipe dehumidification project for an in-store restaurant.

  • Massachusetts Electric new construction design for a supermarket.

  • Narragansett Electric energy management program for an existing convenience store.

  • Duquesne Power & Light PERC recycling dry cleaner project.

  • Metropolitan Edison Company assisted an expanding local airport operator to evaluate and design an electric thermal storage system for a new hanger and associated office building. The new underground system increased available space, improved safety, and reduced heat loss relative to the gas-fired alternative considered for the facility.

  • Metropolitan Edison Company assisted a local school with the installation of an electric heat pump for moisture, humidity, and treatment chemical recovery at the school's indoor swimming pool. In addition to reduced maintenance, the heat pump recovers waste heat and allows the elimination of a water heater.

  • Northeast Utilities' "Energy Conscious Construction Program" has improved commercial building efficiency in over 36 million square feet of new construction and renovations, capturing savings of 93,000 MWh annually through working with the customers' design teams.

Go to Commercial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Option Category:

End Use -- DSM

Name of Option:

Industrial Programs

Description:

The industrial sector accounts for about 40 percent of both electricity and other energy consumption in the U.S. economy. The industrial market represents major opportunities for large increments of load growth, conservation, and load management.

Industrial DSM activities encompass a broad range of utility/customer interactions: load management; interruptible rates; time-of-use pricing; and end use applications.

Primary end use applications for industrial electricity can be grouped under four major headings:

The results of industrial DSM technology options may include:

Barriers:

Go to Industrial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Solutions:

  • Build national partnership with corporate headquarters, e.g., a comprehensive Green Lights type of effort.

  • Support EPRI Industrial Centers and Offices, i.e., EPRI's Industrial Competitiveness Project.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #12 to create a Motor Challenge program to increase market penetration of efficient electrical motor systems.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #13 to establish Golden Carrot programs for industrial air compressors, pumps, fans and drives.

  • Participate in CCAP Action #14 to accelerate the adoption of energy-efficient process technologies.

  • Seek assistance from EPRI in analysis of impacts of DSM investments, i.e., EPRI Tailored Collaborative on Technologies.

  • Use DOE Design Assistance Centers at Sandia National Laboratories and NREL.

  • Pursue rate incentives so utilities can earn a return for conducting DSM programs effectively.

  • Inform stakeholders of the economic and environmental value of high-efficiency motors.

  • Participate in the industry EnviroTech Investment Fund venture capital fund for electrotechnologies and renewable energy technologies.

Industry-proposed solutions requiring legislative, policy, or regulatory action.

  • Tax treatment: Clarification that DSM expenditures are deductible in the year incurred. This can be accomplished either administratively through IRS notification or rulemaking.

Go to Industrial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Partnerships:

  • DOE, EPRI, manufacturers, and DOE National Laboratories, DOE Contact - Diane Pirkey, Manager of DSM Programs, (202) 586-9839.

Case Studies:

  • Minnesota Power's "Industrial Conservation Pilot Project" and "Large Power Audits" provide significant and flexible funding for DSM with increased on-site utility engineering support.

  • Northeast Utilities has assisted more than 200 industrial customers in improving energy efficiency and productivity through its "Energy Action Program" by offering detailed process analysis and incentives to overcome first costs. One such success, involving a manufacturer of cutting tools, reduced electricity use by 20 percent, tripled productivity, eliminated hazardous waste, and won DOE's 1994 National Awards Program.

  • The Motor Challenge program was developed by the DOE to promote voluntary collaborative efforts between the private and public sectors to demonstrate, evaluate, and accelerate the use of efficient industrial electric motor systems. Northern States Power (NSP) has partnered with 3M to develop a showcase demonstration project as part of the Motor Challenge program. This effort focuses on the 35 buildings of the 3M Center Campus located in St. Paul that house production, laboratory, and administrative facilities. Energy reduction measures identified thus far have centered on HVAC and production process improvements.

  • In addition to NSP's prescriptive rebate plan, which offers $5 per horsepower for qualifying new motors and $11 per horsepower for qualifying retrofits of operating motors, NSP is developing a "Motor Retrofit Program." This program will be offered to encourage customers to change out a larger percentage of older, less efficiently operating motors to new high-efficiency motors. Customers are required to look at their entire motor inventory and spotlight present and future motor needs. NSP works with customers and their motor vendors to take advantage of price discounts that can be achieved through large group orders and offer an additional incentive to help offset costs and reduce payback periods.

  • Menasha, Wisconsin, Electric and Water Utilities formed an industrial partnership with a customer, Wisconsin Tissue, to cut peak demand. By installing a $120,000 custom load management system, the utility reduced its system load by 740 kW. The paper company is saving $63,000 annually in reduced demand charges.

  • Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L) has implemented rebate programs for most high-efficiency equipment including a customized program to provide incentives for high-efficiency process modifications. The company has assisted a large firm in converting a CFC-based process to an ammonia-based process and assisted in the installation of thermal storage for process cooling applications. The company has promoted adjustable speed drives for all types of industrial applications and worked with municipal water treatment plants to improve their energy efficiency.

  • Southern California Edison's "Clean Air Coatings" program and internal combustion engine/motor replacement programs.

  • Pennsylvania Electric Company, with support from EPRI, is applying the EPRI pinch evaluation technique at a major industrial customer's plant. The analysis will help determine actual steam requirements and look at alternatives such as electric motors and co-generation for replacing steam drives.

Go to Industrial Programs start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Option Category:

End Use

Name of Option:

Electrotechnologies

Description:

Many new electrotechnologies allow the substitution of an electric process and/or electrical equipment for applications using other fuels or less efficient electric equipment. Where the energy chain involved in electricity production results in lower total emissions than a current alternative, electrotechnologies will provide a net benefit to the environment.

Electrotechnologies may offer, in addition, reduced investment and operating costs, improved product quality, and improved convenience of use. Current applications of electrotechnologies are primarily in the commercial and industrial sector; however, residential applications are increasing.

Go to Electrotechnologies start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Barriers:

  • Cost of equipment; limited information and experience with new technologies; perceived risks and uncertainties regarding performance.

  • Infrastructure, marketing, and financing assistance is needed for firms involved in technology development.

  • Efficient electrotechnologies that produce a net reduction in CO2 emissions may increase demand and, therefore, emissions for individual utilities. However, some regulatory commissions may view this as load building and may penalize the utilities.

  • Many regulators do not have adequate understanding of the potential of electrotechnologies.

Go to Electrotechnologies start.
Return to Table of Contents.

Solutions:

  • Minimize the risk of adopting new electrotechnologies through participation in government-sponsored demonstration projects and cost sharing with industries that adopt environmentally beneficial electrotechnologies.

  • Develop programs to inform and educate potential users of electrotechnologies of the benefits associated with their use, both to the potential user and to the environment.

  • Develop methods for measuring and/or estimating reductions in emissions associated with the use of electrotechnologies.

  • Provide rebates and other incentives to foster developing markets.

  • Participate in the EPRI Tailored Collaboration on Electrotechnologies.

  • Participate in the industry EnviroTech Investment Fund venture capital fund for electrotechnologies and renewable energy technologies.

  • Participate in the development of model testimony to highlight environmental benefits of electrotechnologies to regulators.

Industry-proposed solutions requiring legislative, policy, or regulatory action.

  • Fund federal programs such as National Clean Industry Initiative and the DOE's Mainstreet Program, which will provide opportunities to demonstrate electrotechnologies and move them to more widespread acceptance and use; encourage one-stop shops for information on assessing technical, financial, regulatory, R&D, and other support services for federal, state, and other institutions; provide incentives for investment in energy-efficient electrotechnologies; and provide pollution prevention education and training.

  • Fund programs that encourage the use of electric vehicles, such as the EV Commercial Demonstration Program and the EV Infrastructure Program that were authorized in the Energy Policy Act of 1992.

    Go to Electrotechnologies start.
    Return to Table of Contents.

    Partnerships:

    • DOE, EPRI, EPA, electric utilities, the Electrification Council, Electric Council for the Economy.

    Case Studies:

    • General Public Utilities' operating subsidiaries Jersey Central Power & Light, Metropolitan Edison, and Pennsylvania Electric have initiated electrotechnology programs which provide consulting support, education, and project testing as well as specific project development assistance. Working in cooperation with the EPRI Center for Materials Production, Metropolitan Edison helped a steel casting company obtain an electric sand reclaimer which recovers as much as 98 percent of its casting sand, which would otherwise be landfilled.

    • Metropolitan Edison provided technical input and rebate assistance to a munitions manufacturer for the installation of an electrically controlled water recycling system which conserves nearly 185,000 gallons of municipal water per day and minimizes the release of atmospheric and cooling water contaminants.

    • Potomac Electric Power Company's "Ecolawn" program promoting electric lawnmowers.

    • Indiana Michigan Power electric off-peak automated aluminum melting system.

    • Metropolitan Edison assisted an aluminum foundry customer in replacing two gas-fired crucible-type furnaces with electric resistance melting furnaces to produce a process which virtually eliminates air pollution, reduces metal losses, increases product quality, and reduces labor costs.

    • Georgia Power pressure-treated lumber curing and drying.

    • Kentucky Power open cycle mechanical vapor compression.

    • Pennsylvania Power & Light Tyler Pipe Case.

    • Central Maine Power electric arc furnaces.

    • Indianapolis Power & Light infrared (IR) sand reclamation.

    • Southern California Edison ultraviolet (UV), IR, and radio frequency curing and drying.

    • Northeast Utilities UV curing and drying, IR sand reclaimer.

    • Pennsylvania Electric Company is working with EPRI and a number of hospitals in its territory to evaluate medical waste disposal electrotechnologies, with particular emphasis on pyrolysis and microwave technologies.

    • Pennsylvania Electric Company has participated in the EPRI Center for Material Production Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) Dust Treatment Symposium. It has also helped a number of its industrial customers attend the symposium. This technology transfer activity helps provide industrial customers with information on new clean environmental technologies and the regulatory requirements pertaining to various practices in the customer's industry.

    Go to Electrotechnologies start.
    Return to Table of Contents.


    END USE

    RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

    OTHER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

    TRANSMISSION

    OTHER

    APPENDIX - BIBLIOGRAPHIC MATERIALS




    Please send comments to:
    Lawrence.Mansueti@hq.doe.gov