Climate Challenge Participation Accord
DOE's Energy Partnerships for a Strong Economy
Climate Challenge Participation Accord
This Participation Accord describes the commitments that The Detroit Edison
Company (DECO) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) have made
to participate in the Climate Challenge Program in pursuit of the President's
goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Climate Challenge Program is
a joint, voluntary effort of DOE and the electric utility industry to reduce,
avoid or sequester greenhouse gas emissions. The framework of the Climate
Challenge Program was established in the Climate Challenge Program Memorandum
of Understanding and exhibits thereto dated April 20, 1994 (Climate Challenge
Program MOU) (see Attachment A to this Participation Accord).
I. DECO Commitments
A.
Consistent with paragraph II.B.1.f of the Climate Challenge Program
MOU, DECO will:
Undertake specific projects or actions, or make specific
expenditures on projects or actions, to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions, as
indicated below (supplemental information on DECO's projects is attached):
- Increase nuclear utilization
- Pursue supply-side efficiency improvements
- Implement the new DSM plan
- Adopt a CO2 sequestration strategy
- Participate in EPA's Landfill Methane Outreach Program
- Expand "Energy Partnerships" initiative with customers
- Continue electric vehicle demonstration efforts
- Establish an energy efficient lighting replacement schedule*
B.
DECO will report annually on activities and achievements under the Climate
Challenge Program. Results achieved during each year shall be reported in a
clear and understandable manner that is consistent with the guidelines adopted
pursuant to subsection 1605(b) Energy Policy Act and the Climate Challenge
accounting protocols in Exhibit B of the Climate Challenge Program MOU. The
first such report may include a description of the activities and achievements
of DECO prior to its becoming a participant in the Program,
expressed on an annual basis to the extent possible.
C.
DECO will confer with DOE on or before June 30, 1997 to
evaluate jointly the progress of DECO in achieving its Climate
Challenge Program goals and to discuss possible adjustments to its voluntary
commitments.
D.
The Climate Challenge Program representative for DECO will be:
Ronald L. McIntyre
Director, Environmental Initiatives
The Detroit Edison Co.
2000 Second Ave.
Detroit, MI 48226
DECO agrees to notify DOE prior to or, in any event, no later than 30 days
after any change in the contact.
II. DOE Commitments
III. General Provisions
A.
Use of DOE-developed materials by DECO will be governed by the provisions of
section IV of the Climate Challenge Program MOU, which are hereby incorporated
in this Participation Accord by reference.
B.
In addition to the foregoing provisions, DOE and DECO agree to act in
accordance with the principles set out in section I of the Climate Challenge
Program MOU and the general provisions set out in subsections V.A-V.D, V.F and
V.G of the Climate Challenge Program MOU, which are hereby incorporated by
reference.
C.
Either party may withdraw from this Participation Accord or any of its
activities under the Climate Challenge Program without penalty and without
being subject to remedies at law or equity.
(Original signed by)
________________________________
Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
President and Chief Operating Officer
The Detroit Edison Company
February 3, 1995
(Original signed by)
________________________________
Hazel R. O'Leary
Secretary
U. S. Department of Energy
February 3, 1995
Attachment:
Attachment A -- Climate Challenge Program MOU and exhibits
Supplemental information related to Section I.
Company Description:
The Detroit Edison Company is an investor-owned electric utility which serves
about 2 million customers in 7,600 square miles of Southeastern Michigan. In
1993, system sales were nearly 43,000 GWh and the system peak demand was 9,362
MW. Coal-based generation represented more than 80 percent of the system
output. The Fermi nuclear facility (1110 MW, net winter capability) is the
only non-fossil steam plant in the system.
CO2 Emission Profile:
Year Emission, million tons System Sales, GWh
1987 48.0 39,492
1988 45.8 40,998
1989 44.5 40,585
1990 43.7 40,504
1991 43.6 41,049
1992 39.9 40,697
1993 42.5 42,965
DECO's historical CO2 emissions peaked in 1987, the year Fermi 2 came on line,
and have declined since that time. Steady annual increases in capacity factor
from the nuclear unit have offset fossil generation and resulted in substantial
reductions in CO2 emissions. It should be pointed out that 1992 had an
abnormally cool summer with reduced air conditioning load which further
decreased the need for fossil generation.
DECO Commitments:
- Increase nuclear utilization
On June 22, 1994 DECO announced that during the next refueling outage of the
Fermi 2 nuclear unit in 1996, the Company will replace major turbine
components. This modification is expected to add about 20 megawatts of
generating capacity to the plant. Annual nuclear generation is projected to
increase by 7-8 percent which will provide an additional CO2 emission
offset.
- Pursue supply-side efficiency improvements
* Implement a computerized thermal performance data acquisition. The enhanced
computer modeling features of this system will enable each power plant to
identify specific causes of heat loss and therefore better focus its resources
on efficiency improvements.
* Replace existing control systems on 6 major coal-fired units (total capacity
of 3,950 MW) with state-of-the-art digital control systems.
- Implement the new DSM plan
DECO's Demand Side Management (DSM) plans include activities which:
A. Provide net value to customers without short term rate increases.
B. Provide net value to customers, but require short term rate increases.
C. Provide net value to low income residential customers and require short term
rate increases.
D. Assist customers under Special Manufacturing Contracts, requiring short term
rate increases.
They can be broadly grouped as follows:
Residential
* Energy conservation measures (efficient lighting & refrigerators,
elimination of second refrigerators, etc.).
* Time of use rates for air conditioning and water heating.
* Air conditioning control.
* Shade tree planting.
Manufacturing & Non-manufacturing
* Energy education and credible information on ways to conserve energy.
* Energy audits to identify and recommend energy efficiency improvements.
* Financing methods to support installation of energy efficient equipment.
* Offering DSM rebates for the purchase of cost effective energy efficient
equipment.
Specific applications targeted for these sectors include:
* Retrofitting Exit Signs with lower wattage lamps.
* Compact and/or efficient fluorescent lighting.
* Improved maintenance and efficiency of compressed air systems and air
conditioning chillers.
* Improved pump efficiency through resizing.
* Retrofitting high efficiency motors.
These activities are authorized (or expected to be authorized) under three
separate rate cases. As proposed, the 1995 program is expected to reduce
consumption by 86 GWh. The 1995 DSM plan (and plans for future years) are
subject to modification and/or cancellation by order of the Michigan Public
Service Commission.
- Adopt a CO2 sequestration strategy
The elements of the CO2 sequestration strategy include:
* Improved forest management practices on Company properties.
* 3,000 acres per year of tree seedling planting during the period 1996-2000.
* Community grants and urban forestry activities.
* Participation in the U.S. Initiative for Joint Implementation Rio Bravo
Carbon Sequestration Pilot Project
* Member of UtiliTree Carbon Company
- Participate in EPA's Landfill Methane Outreach Program
DECO has many years experience with landfill gas energy recovery projects and
is a charter member of EPA's outreach program. During 1993, DECO purchased
nearly 130 GWh (up from 40 GWh in 1990) of energy from landfill gas projects in
the service territory. By the year 2000, these purchases are projected to more
than triple due to new capacity additions. DECO is also involved, through its
subsidiary, Biomass Energy Systems, in landfill gas recovery development
efforts. There are active facilities in Michigan and California and thirteen
other projects nation-wide are in various stages of development.
- Expand "Energy Partnerships" initiative with customers
In 1993, DECO piloted a new energy services program (Energy Partnerships) with
the auto industry, whereby DECO engineers were placed at auto manufacturing
plants (one Ford and one General Motors facility) to assist with energy
management activities. The objective of each site team (auto plant and DECO
employees) was to identify, implement, and monitor energy demand and potential
energy savings projects. During the pilot period, each facility achieved a 5-7
GWh annual energy savings. By 1997, multiple teams involving up to 38 DECO
engineers will be involved in the auto maker program. Similar partnerships are
being pursued with other major customers.
- Continue electric vehicle demonstration efforts
DECO is partnering with its automotive and automotive supplier customers to
support commercialization of electric transportation. The Company provides
information about electric transportation research and development, offers
expertise on electric utility infrastructure and facilitates technology
transfer. Specific activities include the following:
* DECO is participating in a 30-month demonstration with Ford Motor Company,
operating 10 Ecostar electric vans.
* DECO is actively involved in electric vehicle infrastructure through the
National Infrastructure Working Council, Electric Transportation Coalition,
Electric Vehicle Association of the Americas, Edison Electric Institute and the
Society of Automotive Engineers.
* DECO has established an electric vehicle rate to provide customers incentive
for electric vehicle usage.
- Establish an energy efficient lighting replacement schedule
One of the major reasons DECO has not signed up for the EPA Green Lights
Program is that our current interpretation of the State and federal
requirements is that fluorescent tubes must be treated as a hazardous waste
(due to mercury). Consequently, disposal costs adversely impact the cost
effectiveness of lighting replacement projects. The disposal issue requires
resolution before DECO can aggressively pursue this energy efficiency option.
Please send comments to:
Lawrence.Mansueti@hq.doe.gov
|