Climate Challenge Participation Accord
DOE's Energy Partnerships for a Strong Economy
Climate Challenge Participation Accord
This participation Accord describes the commitments that
Central and South West Corporation (CSW), on behalf of its electric operating
subsidiaries, and the U.S - Department of Energy (DOE) have made to participate
in the Climate Challenge Program in pursuit of the President's goals for
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Climate Challenge Program is a joint,
voluntary effort of DOE and the electric utility industry to reduce, avoid
or sequester greenhouse gas emissions. The framework of the Climate Challenge
Program was established by the Climate Challenge Program Memorandum of
Understanding and exhibits thereto dated April 20, 1994. (For the Climate
Challenge Program MOU, see Attachment A to this Participation Accord)
1. CSW Commitments
A. Consistent with paragraph II.B. I (a and f) of the Climate
Challenge Program MOU, CSW has undertaken specific activities and has made
specific expenditures on projects that are expected to produce reductions
or offsets in greenhouse gas emissions. These activities and programs are
described below. CSW will continue all these activities as long as benefits
are deemed cost-effective and supporting business circumstances exist.
CSW is participating in the following industry-wide Climate
Challenge initiatives:
-
The Utility Forest Carbon Management Program with a $5,000
initial commitment in 1994 and $20,000 per year for 1996 through 2000.
-
The National Earth Comfort Program with $50,000 in funding
each year for 1994, 1995 and 1996. Participation in this program is re-evaluated
on an annual basis.
CSW has undertaken or will undertake a variety of activities
that are expected to produce an estimated total of 731,425 short tons Of
C02 reductions/offsets in the year 2000. Projects for which
CSW has estimated these CO2 reduction/offsets
are:
- Demand Side Management (DSM) activities - CSW currently has
several DSM programs which promote efficient electricity use and result
in reduced C02 emissions. These programs range from evaluating potential
efficiency improvements to providing incentives to adopt more efficient
equipment for individual homeowners, commercial and industrial customers.
T-he current projection for C02 reductions
resulting from DSM programs in the year 2000 is 329,000 short tons.
-
Coal combustion by-product use - Coal combustion by-products
(fly ash) often can be used as a substitute for portland cement in concrete
production. This eliminates the need to dispose of the fly ash and also
eliminates the emissions associated with manufacturing portland cement.
Projected year 2000 fly ash sales of 370,000 tons from CSW facilities for
use as a substitute for portland cement will result in a reduction of 293,000
short tons of CO2.
-
Renewable generation - In 1993, CSW began a series of renewable
energy projects that will provide additional future C02emission
reductions/offsets. These projects include a state-of-the-art wind and
solar energy project CSW has constructed in West Texas. Attachment B provides
further details on CSW's renewable projects. As these technologies are
evaluated over time, those which are found to be cost-effective will be
implemented as opportunities occur. In response to customer feedback, CSW
is also proposing a program in 1997 of "green power" choices which will
provide a means for customers to select a greater portion of their personal
consumption from environmentally beneficial renewable generation. CSW will
undertake this program once it is approved by tile Texas Public Utility
Commission. Expected CO2 emissions
offset by renewable electricity generation in the year 2000 is 77,500 short
tons.
- Transmission efficiency improvements - CSW. has undertaken
operation and equipment changes to the CSW transmission system that are
expected to result in 30,000 short tons of CO2 reduction
in the year 2000 through reduced load losses.
- Tree planting activities - CSW's land management activities
include planting approximately 179,000 around facility sites and in urban
areas, which will sequester 1,925 short tons of C02 in the year
2000.
- Research activities - CSW annually provides research funding
to the Electric Power Research Institute, approximately $2,500,000 of which
supports R&D projects (electro-technologies, environmental controls,
etc.) that are expected to result in greenhouse gas emission reductions.
The projects for which C02 reductions have
been quantified are summarized in Table 1.B.
CSW will report annually on activities and achievements
under the Climate Challenge Program. Results achieved during each year
shall be reported in a clear and understandable manner that is consistent
with the guidelines adopted pursuant to subsection 1605(b) of the Energy
Policy Act and the Climate Challenge accounting protocols in Exhibit B
of the Climate Challenge Program MOU. The first such report may include
a description of the activities and achievements of CSW prior to becoming
a participant in the Program, expressed on an annual basis to the extent
possible
CSW will confer with DOE on or before October 1, 1998,
to evaluate jointly the progress of CSW in achieving its Climate Challenge
Program goals and to discuss possible adjustments to its voluntary commitments.
D. The Climate Challenge Program representative for CSW
will be Mr. Bruce W. Moore, Central and South West Services, Inc., PO Box
660164, Dallas, Texas 75266-0164, (214)777-1288. CSW agrees to notify DOE
prior to or, in any event, no later than 30 days after any change in the
contact.
DOE Commitments
A. DOE's commitments to CSW are those set out in section
III of the Climate Challenge Program MOU, which are hereby, incorporated
in this Participation Accord by reference.
B. DOE will consider CSW requests to intervene in regulatory
proceedings of federal, state and local commissions and boards on issues
pertinent to the Climate Challenge Program.
Before DOE intervenes in regulatory and other programs
pertaining to CSW for purposes of addressing Climate Challenge Program
issues, it will provide notice to CSW.
C. DOE will provide an annual report to CSW describing
the actions that it has taken to fulfill its commitments under section
III and Exhibit C of the Climate Challenge Program MOU and the results
of those actions.
D. The Climate Challenge Program representative for DOE,
who will serve as liaison to CSW, will be Mr. Larry Mansueti, Director,
Climate Challenge, Office of Utility Technologies (EE-10), U.S. Department
of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, (202)586-2588.
DOE agrees to notify CSW prior to or, in any event, no later dm 30 days
after any change in liaison responsibilities or personnel.
III. General Provisions
A. Use of DOE-developed materials by CSW will be
governed by the provisions of section W of the Climate Challenge Program
MOU, which are hereby incorporated in this Participation Accord by reference.
B. In addition to the foregoing provisions, DOE
and CSW agree to act in accordance with the principles set out in section
I of the Climate Challenge Program MOU and the general provisions set out
in subsections V.A-V.D, V.F and V.G of the Climate Challenge Program MOU,
which are hereby incorporated by reference.
C. Either party may withdraw from this Participation Accord
or any of its activities under the Climate Challenge Program without penalty
and without being subject to remedies at law or equity.
E. R. Brooks
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Central and South West Corporation |
Federico Pena
Secretary of Energy
U.S. Department of Energy |
| ____________________________________[date] |
October 8, 1997 _______________________[date] |
Attachments:
Attachment A - Climate Challenge Program, MOU
Attachment B - Wind and Solar Project Fact Sheets
TABLE I
|
Activity
|
CO2 reduced/offset
(short tons in year 2000) |
Demand Side Management
Coal Combustion By-products
Renewable Generation
Transmission Efficiency Improvements
Tree Planting |
329,000
293,000
77,500
30,000
1,925
|
|
TOTAL
|
731,000
|
Attachment B
CENTRAL & SOUTHWEST
Renewables Project
Information Sheets
And Cost Estimates
CSW Wind Farm – 6.6 MW
| Location |
20 miles west of Fort Davis, Texas on Highway 166 |
| Manufacturer |
Zond, Inc. of Tehachapi, California. The 550 kW Zond Z40 (40 meter
rotor diameter) was the largest wind turbine commercially manufactured
in the United States at the time it was, selected. Zond is now manufacturing
750 kW turbines for a project in Minnesota. |
| How It Works |
Twelve 3 blade fixed speed turbines on 40m lattice tower capture wind
energy to drive an electric generator. |
| Annual Capacity |
20% |
| Cost |
- $900 to $1000/kW currently
- $600-700/kW high volume commercial production (year 20) |
| Attributes |
- Intermittent energy production
- Large, highly visible structures
- Lowest cost renewable technology available today
- Avian interaction must be considered |
| Status |
Commercial today (CSW project tests state-of-the-art advanced turbine
designs as part of the DOE's Turbine Verification Program) |
| Related Studies |
Wind Noise Study
Avian Study
Wind Performance Study |
| In Service Date |
Began operation in September 1995 |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
11,500,000 kWh |
| Production |
1995 594,640 kWh
1996 8,614,249 kWh |
Proposed CSW Wind Farm - 1.2 MW
| Location |
Undetermined at this time. Oklahoma or Texas most likely. |
| Manufacturer |
Cannon Inc. will supply 4 Cannon Wind Eagle 300 wind
turbines. Texas Wind Power Co. and CSW will provide balance of plant construction
and operations. |
| How It Works |
Four 2 blade fixed speed turbines on 50m guyed-pole tower
capture Wind energy to drive an electric generator. |
| Annual Capacity |
30% is expected |
| Cost |
$900 to $1000/kW currently $400-500/kW high volume commercial
production (year 2005) |
| Attributes |
Lower initial capital cost
Intermittent energy production
Less Visible structures
Avian interaction must be considered |
| Status |
Early commercial units today (CSW project tests state-of-the-art
advanced turbine designs as part of the DOEs Turbine Verification Program) |
| Related Studies |
Wind Noise Study
Avian Study
Wind Performance Study |
| In Service Date |
Expect operation by early 1998 |
Expected
Production in
year 2000 |
3,153,600 kWh |
Proposed CSW Wind Farm - 50 NM p
| Location |
Location undetermined at this time. Most likely West Texas. |
| Manufacturer |
Unknown at this time |
| Annual Capacity |
35% is expected |
| Cost |
$900 to $1000/kW currently
* $400-500/kW high volume commercial production (year 2005) |
| Status |
RFP to be released in April 1997 |
| In Service Date |
Expect operation by late 1999 |
Expected
Production in
Year 2000. |
153,300,000 kWh |
PV for Grid Support - Flat Plate Technology (100 kW)
| Location |
CSW Solar Park located 10 miles northwest of Fort Davis near McDonald
Observatory on Hwy 118 |
| Manufacturer |
Utility Power Group is the system integrator using Siesmen’s single
crystal silicon modules and integrated tracking system</td>
|
| How It Works |
Sunlight shines on semiconductor material causing a flow of electrons
through an electrical circuit |
| Efficiency |
10-12% of the sun’s energy converted to electrical energy |
| Cost |
- $7,000-10,000/ kW currently
- $2,500/kW high-volume to commercial production |
| Attributes |
- Sunlight is accepted from a wide angle
- Modules track east to west daily
- Low noise
- Operation at partial capacity on cloudy days
- Ease of construction with short lead time
- PVUSA host system |
| Status |
Early commercial deployment |
| In Service Date |
Began operation in September 1994 |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
262,800 kWh |
| Production |
1994 32,735 kWh
1995 160,343 kWh
1996 227,333 kWh |
PV for Grid Support - Concentrating Technology (83 kW)
| Motion |
CSW Solar Park located 10 miles northwest of Fort Davis near McDonald
Observatory on Hwy 118 |
| Manufacturer |
ENTECH, D/FW Airport, TX |
| How It Works |
Plastic fresnel lens is used to concentrate the sun’s energy 21 times
on a single crystal silicon cells, causing a flow of electrons through
an electrical circuit |
| Efficiency |
14% of the sun’s energy converted to electrical energy |
| Cost |
$10,000-13,000/ kW currently |
| Attributes |
* Modules track east to west daily, north to south seasonally
* Less semiconductor material than flat plate FV
* Requires direct sunlight
* PVUSA host system
* Well-suited to West Texas climate |
| Status |
Early field trial |
| In Service Date |
Began operation February 1995 |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
147,000 kWh |
| Production |
1995 92,800 kWh
1996 87,296 kWh |
PV for Grid Support-Integrated High Concentrating System
(18 kw)
| Location |
CSW Solar Park located 10 miles northwest of Fort Davis near McDonald
Observatory on Hwy 118 |
| Manufacturer |
AMONIX, Torrance, California |
| How It Works |
Lens is used to concentrate the suns energy 250 times on semiconductor
material, causing a flow of electrons through an electrical circuit |
| Efficiency |
18% of the sun's energy converted to electrical
energy |
| Cost |
$20 to $30/W currently for prototype systems; EPRI projects costs to
decline to $2 to $3/W when the system is mass produced. |
| Attributes |
Large platform, dual axis tracking system
Utilizes existing semiconductor industry
Potential for mass production |
| Status |
Demonstrations by CSW, Arizona Public Service, and Nevada Power. Early
commercialization by year 2000. |
| In Service Date |
November, 1996. |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
30,660 kWh |
Rooftop PV - Fixed Flat Plate Technology (2 kW
Each)
| Location |
All systems are located in Fort Davis, Texas on residential and
commercial properties. |
| Manufacturer |
Modules by:
Siemen's
Solarex
Astropower
Mobil
Unisolar.
Ascension Technology is the system integrator. |
| How It Works |
The fixed flat plate modules are mounted on customers' rooftops.Sunlight
shines on semiconductor material causing a flow of electrons through an
electrical circuit |
| Efficiency |
10-12% of the sun’s energy converted to electrical energy |
| Cost |
$7,000-8,000/kW currently
$2,000/ kW high volume commercial production |
| Attributes |
Low cost mounting systemNo additional real estate requirementsUltimately,
a replacement for roofing material
Generation close to usage site |
| Status |
Early commercial applications |
| In Service Date |
2nd quarter 1994 - installed |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
26,280 kWh |
Other Small Scale PV Applications
· PV-operated
lighting at the HEB grocery store in Laredo, TX - 4 kW
· PV-assisted heat pump in Marfa, TX - 2 kW0 Rooftop
PV system on PS(Ys district office in Lawton, OK - 18 kW (co-funded by
EPA)
BP Solar Off-Grid Residential PV (1.5kW each)
| Location |
CSW Solar Park located 10 miles northwest of Fort Davis near
McDonald Observatory on Hwy 118 |
| Manufacturer |
BP Solar is the system integrator using BP Solar modules, Absolyte
batteries, and Kohler generator. |
| How It Works |
The fixed flat plate modules are ground mounted on single pole.
Sunlight shines on semiconductor material causing a flow of electrons
through an electrical circuit. |
| Efficiency |
14% of the sun’s energy converted to electrical energy |
| Cost |
$15,000/kW currently w/ batteries and back-up generator |
| Attributes |
Low cost mounting system
Ultimately, a replacement for roofing material
Generation close to usage site |
| Status |
Early commercial applications |
| In Service Date |
3rd quarter 1996 -'installed' |
| Expected Production in year 2000 |
5,000 kWh |
Other Off-grid PV Applications
PV-powered water pumping for irrigation in Marfa, TX
PV street lighting in Marfa, TX
PV-powered stock watering near Fort Davis, TX
7.5 kW Solar Dish/ Stirling Engine System
| Manufacturer |
Cummins Power Generation, Abilene, TX |
| How It Works |
Solar dish concentrates sunlight, providing a heat source. Heat is
transferred to a Stirling engine, which drives an electric generator. The
Stirling cycle uses an external heat source rather than internal combustion
to drive the engine's pistons. |
| Efficiency |
*25% of the sun's energy converted to electrical energy* |
| Cost |
Approximately $1,500/kW in commercial production |
| Attributes |
Lends itself to distributed generation ("putting generation where you
need it')
Potential for gaseous co-firing
Highly efficient conversion from sunlight to electricity |
| Status |
Early field trial |
| In Service Date |
In 1995, a Dish Stirling system was completed and interconnected to
the West Texas Utilities grid in Abilene, Texas. The Stirling engine component
of the system operated poorly due to quality control and metallurgy problems.
Also in 1995,,a solar dish was installed at the CSW Solar Park in Fort
Davis, Texas, but the Stirling engine that was to be incorporated with
the system was not completed before Cummins Power Generation went out of
business in mid-1996. The system at the CSW Solar Park was disassembled
and removed in 1996. |
Renewables Project Funding Summary
|
Research Project
|
CSW Ren.
Proj. ($)
|
|
Other ($)
|
| PV End-use |
65,000
|
0
|
0
|
| HEB System (4kW) |
17,000
|
0
|
40,000 CSW Marketing
|
| PV Assisted Heat Pump (2kW) |
100,000
|
100,000
|
0
|
| PV EPA-DSM Lawton (18kW) |
51,000
|
51,000
|
102,000 EPA
|
| Resource Monitoring |
370,000
|
>0
|
0
|
| Cummins Sterling Dish (7.5 kW) |
218,000
|
218,000
|
323,000 Cummins
|
| PV Grid Flat Plate – UPG, Hardware
only (100 kW) |
510,000
|
510,000
|
0
|
| PV Concentrating – Entech, Hardware
only (18kW) |
671,000
|
671,000
|
0
|
| PV Covered Parking – Unisolar
(2-4kW) |
225,000
|
225,000
|
67,000
|
| PV Rooftop (9-2kW) |
124,250
|
124,250
|
8,000
|
| Installed Cost |
172,750
|
0
|
26,000
|
| Consulting/Monitoring |
30,000
|
0
|
0
|
| Wind Farm (6MW) |
|
|
|
| Installed Cost of Monitoring,
Distribution Sys |
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
2,000,000 DOE
|
| Line Extension, Monitoring Equipment |
|
|
|
| Wind Noise Study – University
of TX at El Paso |
55,000
|
55,000
|
0
|
| |
|
|
|
| Avian Study – Sul Ross/Clemson
University |
40,000
|
40,000
|
0
|
| EPRI Wind Oversight |
150,000
|
150,000
|
0
|
| |
|
|
|
| 1.2MW Wind Farm (Proposed Lawton,
OK) |
106,000
|
656,000
|
1,594,000 DOE/Cannon
|
| Project Communications |
515, 000
|
0
|
0
|
| Power Quality Study – University
of Arkansas |
80,000
|
80,000
|
0
|
| Solar Performance Study – New
Mexico State Univ. |
119,000
|
119,000
|
>0
|
| Solar Site Preparation (Other
Costs) |
540,000
|
150,000
|
0
|
| EPRI Solar Oversight |
98,000
|
98,000
|
0
|
| Database, Overall Report, Societal
Study (TX Tech) |
376,000
|
0
|
0
|
| Wind Rights |
200,000
|
0
|
0
|
| CSW |
2,012,000
|
0
|
0
|
|
Total
|
10,000,000
|
6,402,250
|
4,160,000
|
Return to the Climate Challenge Front Page
Please send comments to:
Lawrence.Mansueti@hq.doe.gov
|